Mar. 14th, 2009 @ 02:24 pm Government to track movement out of the country
Hiding out here: CT2
Mostly feeling: grumpy
Now Playing: Star Trek DS9: S7 E09 Covenant
I'm currently feeling rather annoyed by this. " All travel plans to be tracked by Government". Under the plans, starting to be brought in already: "Anyone departing the UK by land, sea or air will have their trip recorded and stored on a database for a decade."

I don't know where to start on this, or what annoys me most. Perhaps it is the justifcation from the government:

"The changes are being brought in as the Government tries to tighten border controls and increase protection against the threat of international terrorism."


How does tracking people leaving the country and holding the details for 10 years protect us against terrorism? This comes across as a standard line from the government, much like how ID cards will apparently protect us, even if they didn't protect the people of Madrid.

Or it might be the "condemnation" of the plans by Chris Grayling, the home affairs spokesman for the Conservatives:

""Of course we need to keep a proper record of people as they come in and leave the country.

"My worry is that the Government is creating something which will be unwieldy, impossible to manage and expensive to operate.

"I think this system has to be much simpler."
"


I don't know about you, but that doesn't sound much like it's condemning the plans to me.

Grrrr. This government is making me so annoyed with plans like this I barely know where to start. As soon as one lot are withdrawn, another lot comes up. I'm starting to feel quite worn down by it all.
What about this entry?
XKCD sheeple
[User Picture Icon]
From:[info]b_liz
Date: March 17th, 2009 10:39 am (UTC)
(Link me)
I wonder if the Channel Tunnel comes under 'land' or 'sea' or neither.

And how does it help if all that is recorded is that they go to France, with no note of whether they stayed in France or went on to a terrorist training camp somewhere else.
(pok me!) (Thread)